Pure + city = Venice

Peter Ackryod has written a book about Venice.   Venice: Pure City.   Pure, I think not in the sense of cleanliness, but pure in its essence as a city.   Venice is just that, a city.   It has only ever been that and will continue to only ever be that. Venice has never been the ‘capital’ of a country, and until Napoleon had never been a conquered city.   It is a city.  It has never had any land.  It was the centre of a republic without owning an army.

It has been a long read, but an interesting one.   However I think that Ackroyd has fallen victim to generalisations, and views Venice a lot like the English authors he quotes.   I don’t think he loves the city, and I don’t think that he is overly objective.

If you’re looking for a read about the essence of Venice Jan Morris does it better and with much more empathy.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Books, Italy, Travel, Uncategorized, Venice. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s